Hannah Dames
Hannah Dames
Verified email at cs.uni-freiburg.de - Homepage
Cited by
Cited by
When does a reasoner respond: Nothing follows?
M Ragni, H Dames, D Brand, N Riesterer
CogSci, 2640-2546, 2019
Intentional forgetting in artificial intelligence systems: Perspectives and challenges
IJ Timm, S Staab, M Siebers, C Schon, U Schmid, K Sauerwald, L Reuter, ...
Joint German/Austrian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Künstliche …, 2018
Modeling Human Syllogistic Reasoning: The Role of “No Valid Conclusion”
N Riesterer, D Brand, H Dames, M Ragni
Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (1), 446-459, 2020
Searching vs. Browsing—The Influence of Consumers’ Goal Directedness on Website Evaluations
H Dames, G Hirschfeld, T Sackmann, MT Thielsch
Interacting with Computers 31 (1), 95-112, 2019
A Meta-Analysis of Conditional Reasoning
M Ragni, H Dames, P Johnson-Laird
17th international conference on cognitive modeling (ICCM 2019), 2019
The Role of Feedback and Post-Error Adaptations in Reasoning
H Dames, C Schiebel, M Ragni
Retrieved from osf. io/dy3gr, 2020
Analyzing the Differences in Human Reasoning via Joint Nonnegative Matrix Factorization
D Brand, N Riesterer, H Dames, M Ragni
Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2020
Die Sicht des Kunden: Unterschiede in der Website-Bewertung
H Dames, T Sackmann, MT Thielsch
Mensch und Computer 2017-Usability Professionals, 2017
Intentional Forgetting in Artificial Intelligence Systems: Perspectives and Challenges
U Schmid, K Sauerwald, L Reuter, M Ragni, C Niederée, H Maus, ...
KI 2018: Advances in Artificial Intelligence: 41st German Conference on AI …, 2018
Multinomial Processing Models for Syllogistic Reasoning: A Comparison.
H Dames, JO von Hartz, M Kantz, N Riesterer, M Ragni
CogSci, 2018
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–10