| Argumentation schemes D Walton, C Reed, F Macagno Cambridge University Press, 2008 | 1959 | 2008 |
| Emotive language in argumentation F Macagno, D Walton Cambridge University Press, 2014 | 168 | 2014 |
| Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence C Reed, D Walton, F Macagno The Knowledge Engineering Review 22 (1), 87-109, 2007 | 163 | 2007 |
| Argument from analogy in law, the classical tradition, and recent theories F Macagno, D Walton Philosophy & rhetoric 42 (2), 154-182, 2009 | 77 | 2009 |
| Araucaria as a tool for diagramming arguments in teaching and studying philosophy G Rowe, F Macagno, C Reed, D Walton Teaching Philosophy 29 (2), 111-124, 2006 | 71 | 2006 |
| What we hide in words: Emotive words and persuasive definitions F Macagno, D Walton Journal of Pragmatics 42 (7), 1997-2013, 2010 | 69 | 2010 |
| A classification system for argumentation schemes D Walton, F Macagno Argument & Computation 6 (3), 219-245, 2015 | 68 | 2015 |
| Reasoning from classifications and definitions D Walton, F Macagno Argumentation 23 (1), 81-107, 2009 | 60* | 2009 |
| Analyzing the pragmatic structure of dialogues F Macagno, S Bigi Discourse Studies 19 (2), 148-168, 2017 | 58 | 2017 |
| What students’ arguments can tell us: Using argumentation schemes in science education F Macagno, A Konstantinidou Argumentation 27 (3), 225-243, 2013 | 55 | 2013 |
| Classifying the patterns of natural arguments F Macagno, D Walton Philosophy & Rhetoric 48 (1), 26-53, 2015 | 53 | 2015 |
| Types of dialogue, dialectical relevance, and textual congruity F Macagno Anthropology & Philosophy 8 (1-2), 101-121, 2007 | 49* | 2007 |
| An argumentation framework for contested cases of statutory interpretation D Walton, G Sartor, F Macagno Artificial Intelligence and Law 24 (1), 51-91, 2016 | 45 | 2016 |
| Argument relevance and structure. Assessing and developing students’ uses of evidence F Macagno International Journal of Educational Research 79, 180-194, 2016 | 44 | 2016 |
| Developing argumentation strategies in electronic dialogs: Is modeling effective? E Mayweg-Paus, F Macagno, D Kuhn Discourse Processes 53 (4), 280-297, 2016 | 43 | 2016 |
| The argumentative structure of persuasive definitions F Macagno, D Walton Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (5), 525-549, 2008 | 43 | 2008 |
| Argumentation theory in education studies: Coding and improving students’ argumentative strategies F Macagno, E Mayweg-Paus, D Kuhn Topoi 34 (2), 523-537, 2015 | 40 | 2015 |
| Reconstructing metaphorical meaning F Macagno, B Zavatta Argumentation 28 (4), 453-488, 2014 | 40 | 2014 |
| Understanding students’ reasoning: argumentation schemes as an interpretation method in science education A Konstantinidou, F Macagno Science & Education 22 (5), 1069-1087, 2013 | 38 | 2013 |
| Implicatures as forms of argument F Macagno, D Walton Perspectives on pragmatics and philosophy, 203-225, 2013 | 38 | 2013 |
Douglas WaltonDistinguished Research Fellow, CRRAR, University of WindsorVerified email at uwindsor.ca
